Solid-State Relays vs. Electromechanical Relays
Choosing the Right Solution for Smart Building Automation
Solid-State Relays vs. Electromechanical Relays
Choosing the Right Solution for Smart Building Automation
Relays are devices that switch electrical loads and are considered the heart of smart building automation. There are two types of relays: solid-state relays (SSRs) and electromechanical relays (EMRs). You must choose the best relay suitable for your application, as the choice impacts smart building automation systems' performance, reliability, and longevity. This article can guide you in selecting the right solution for advanced building automation applications. It examines the key differences, strengths, and limitations of SSRs and EMRs.

Figure 1: Structure and operating principle of SSRs and EMRs (image source)
Both relay types have distinctive advantages and trade-offs. An informed choice is essential for optimizing smart building operations
| Features | Solid-State Relays (SSRs) | Electromechanical Relays (EMRs) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating mechanism | Operate using semiconductor devices like triacs, thyristors, or MOSFETs to perform switching without physical contact. This ensures silent operation and eliminates the degradation typically associated with mechanical components. | Use an electromagnetic coil to move mechanical contacts for switching. While simple and practical, this mechanism results in wear over time due to physical movement and arcing. |
| Switching speed | Deliver fast and precise switching, making them ideal for applications requiring rapid cycling or real-time adjustments. | Have slower response times due to the mechanical movement of contacts, which can be a limitation in dynamic systems. |
| Durability | Provide a longer operational lifespan since they lack moving parts. They are particularly reliable in environments where frequent switching is required. | Prone to mechanical degradation, limiting their lifespan in high-usage scenarios. |
| Load compatibility | Handle non-linear and low-current loads efficiently, such as LED drivers and low-power control circuits. They excel in smart building applications where load variability is common. | Better suited for high-current and high-voltage resistive loads, such as heating elements or industrial-grade motors. |
| Power consumption | Consume less control power, aligning with the energy-saving goals of smart buildings. | Require more power to energize their coils, leading to higher operational energy costs. |
| Noise and interference | Operate silently, an advantage in settings prioritizing occupant comfort. However, they can generate electrical noise that requires mitigation in sensitive circuits. | Produce audible clicks during operation, which may be unsuitable for noise-sensitive environments such as offices or healthcare facilities. |
| Heat generation | May require heat sinks at high currents. | Generate less heat but experience more mechanical degradation. |
Understanding the strengths and limitations of SSRs and EMRs is essential for their optimal use. Each relay type has unique benefits and, unfortunately, a few trade-offs.
| Type | Strength | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| SSRs | Silent operation, fast switching, long lifespan, low maintenance, and compatibility with modern smart control systems. | Higher initial costs, heat dissipation challenges, and potential for electrical noise in certain setups. |
| EMRs | Affordable for high-power applications, robust for straightforward automation tasks, and effective in systems with low switching frequency. | Noisy operation, shorter lifespan due to mechanical wear, and higher power consumption. |
Solid State Relays (SSRs) and Electromechanical Relays (EMRs) integrate advanced technologies making them crucial to the Smart building automation ecosystem. SSRs and EMRs higher operational efficiency, comfort, and security, with each providing unique advantages suited to various applications.
When choosing between SSRs and EMRs, consider the following factors-
Modern HVAC systems play a crucial role in maintaining thermal comfort and indoor air quality across commercial buildings. A prime example is the use of Air Handler Units (AHUs), which filter, heat, cool, dehumidify, and distribute air throughout large spaces. Historically, such systems relied on electromechanical relays (EMRs) or even mercury displacement relays, but advancements have led to the adoption of Solid-State Relays (SSRs), like those provided by Sensata Technologies.
SSRs offer numerous advantages for HVAC systems, including extended lifespan, silent operation, low power consumption, and rapid switching capabilities. Their suitability for handling diverse loads, such as fans, blowers, motors, and electric heating elements, makes them invaluable in applications demanding constant and precise operation. For example, proportional control methods like phase-angle or burst-fire control, achievable only with SSRs, ensure accurate temperature regulation in heating systems.
Sensata's product line, including the DR67 and PM67 series SSRs, exemplifies this evolution. These DIN rail and panel-mounted SSRs, equipped with built-in overvoltage protection and versatile input configurations, seamlessly handle fan/motor control and heating applications in AHUs. By replacing older technologies, these SSRs not only enhance reliability and efficiency but also contribute to quieter and more sustainable HVAC solutions.

Figure 2: Air handler unit controlled by several SSRs (image source)
SSRs and EMRs play different roles in smart building automation. SSRs offer precision, durability, and silent operation, making them perfect for advanced IoT systems. In contrast, EMRs are versatile and cost-effective for handling high-current and inductive loads. Selecting the right relay involves balancing speed, load type, and cost considerations. Evaluating project requirements, designers can harness the strengths of each relay type to create efficient, reliable, and future-ready smart building solutions that elevate automation capabilities.